Is democracy the best form of governance? Essay

Democracy is debatably , by far the most challenging nominate of governance for both, politicians and the battalion. Though land is often described as the government elected by the people, there are cases where a countrys determination to change from an authoritarian regime to a parliamentary one has been forced upon by foreign interventions. However, recent semipolitical insurgency in countries where state has been oblige shows that for the people to truly accept and respect the ideals of democracy, it essential grow naturally. Many argue that interventions can be successful minded(p) the right conditions. For instance chances of the democratic transactions being successful if the state has a stable economy is relatively higher. There have been past successes like Germany and Japan after field War II where imposition of democracy has worked. It is also seen that in many cases without intervention, the individuals who were seeking to defend their rights in their homeland w ould have been unsuccessful.For example the peoples movement in Libya, though it had gained much suport would have been suppressed had it not been for the NATOs involvement. There is also the concept that promoting democracy promotes peace. If people are given their freedom to air their views and feelings of marginalization are pr scourted then terrorism is less probably to arise. Thus promoting democracy by imposing it, we increase the chances of a inactive world. Many believe that democracy is the best form of governance which ensures that the rights of the citizens are not violated and gives them the freedom to express their ideas and thus it is their humanitarian obligation to vex democracy to those who do not have it. On the contrary, it is believed that an intervention is very likely to fail as the government is being formed against the countrys will and is less likely to gain support. Democratic governments prove to be successful only when the government is chosen by the p eople and is more likely to command respect and maintain order. Democracies are not necessarily more peaceful than other form of governments.Just because democracies have not gone to struggle in the past does not mean that it is less likely to go into war in the future. Invasions, mainly by the western nations, increase the tension betwixt the East and the West and force the formation of terrorist groups which in turn threatens world peace. The 9/11 attack is proof enough to say that imposing democracy fuels terrorist groups. In Osama Bin Ladens letter to the American people he cited interventions in Somalia, India,Palestine, Chechnya, Lebanon and Iraq as reasons for the attack. Just because we prioritize and believe on political self determination being an important value, it does not mean that all nations believe in it too. For instance some nations may prioritize on ghostlike value and prefer to be ruled by a government which promises divine authority. And some may believe in stability of the government and ability not want it to keep on changing every few years.Countries of the middle east like Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Jordan and so on can be taken as examples while considering countries which are non-democratic and peaceful. Taking recent happenings into consideration, western efforts to impose democracy has largely failed. For instance in countries like Iraq, Afghanistan and Vietnam the imposition of democracy has led to political instability but still western countries, United States in particular believes that it is their duty to bring democracy to other countries. Trying to tape transport the western lifestyle to totally different locations with complex history and traditions is not an easy task. Besides, when people are bullied into following a completely different system, people are most likely to oppose it.Todays fully functional democratic countries include Spain, Portugal, Greece, etc which were once ruled by dictators and only dour int o democracies after homegrown movements and the politically instable countries include Iraq, Afghanistan, Egypt, etc where democracy was imposed. Thus, we can see that imposing democracy has led to nothing but disruption in the want term. Imposing democracy has caused more disruption than peace. The white mans burden as the movement is most popularly referred to , has caused much tension surrounded by the west and the east. Imposing democracy in countries where people prioritize values like religion and stability is not going to be successful as the people are not going to be cooperative. And the government formed that is not formed for the people is, by definition not a democracy. Democracy, even if established by imposition will still be the rule of the majority however for the people to truly accept this form of governance it must grow naturally.